Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Don't touch my junk!

Dear Big Sis (AKA Janet Napolitano),

Congratulations on undoing any last stand that the Obama Administration had to any shred of holding on to after the last election cycle. The Democrats already lost in huge waves across the country on spending and Government Forced Health Care Deform. Now you have single handedly put an end to any hope that President Obama had of actually not being a one term President. Even Joe Biden did not wield that much authority with all of his shortcomings.

The TSA on your order is out of control and violating the Rights of the People from whom you derive Power. Unless you have forgotten the Constitution, We the People...not you the Federal Government. We are issuing a cease and desist order.

With your current actions the Federal Government is now the largest distributor of pornography. People have two choices, submit to a photo shoot or be sexually assaulted. Failure to submit to either of those actions will now be subject to prosecution. Prisoners have more rights that people who buy airline tickets. If a Sheriff tried to pull a stunt like this, yourself along with the NAACP, Rainbow Push, and every other Civic Left-Wing organization would be calling for this head. However, it is once again apparent that it is acceptable to violate one's rights as long as it comes from the Left.

Now you are making exceptions for Ms, while patting down Catholic Nuns. It is actually unbelievable that the Federal Government has become so "Politically Correct" that you will NOT search those who DO seek to do us harm while actually violating the rights of the people whom you are sworn to protect. Padding down 3 year old children in airports. Now screeners sticking their hands down people's pants.

You who are not an elected official, however you represent those who entrusted you with your authority and reflect on him. You have shown through your actions that President Obama is so out of touch with reality, the American Public, and the United States Constitution.

Keep your hands off of me. Keep your hands off of my children. If you want to stop terroroists, then stop terrorists and stop terrorizing us.

Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas

Tuesday, September 21, 2010


President Obama,

I apologize for my long absence. It seems that since I was unaware that the recession had ended and I was still focused on making ends meet for my family. Now that I know that you say that the recession ended last year I can return to addressing your comments while I assist my friends and neighbors in job hunting. We have a lot of catching up to do.

While facing a mid-term election for your goons, I mean Congress; you are once again in campaign mode. You are looking for someone other the George W. Bush to blame for the rising unemployment, increase in jobless claims, and increase of taxes to pay for Health Care "reform". To deter the protesting of the people and civil unrest you have leap to action. You and your teleprompter challenged the Tea Party to specifically state what they would do. I suppose that once again the "Google" has eluded you. It would be too difficult to see what they are seeking, much like reading the Arizona Immigration Law. With your challenge Conservative groups are stepping up. The 9-12 Group is considering changing its name to 7-11 to demonstrate cut backs to you in this economy. However, you would probably respond better if they changed their name to 4-15.

Hearing that Citizens do not want higher taxes you once again felt the need to respond. You said "If you're making a billion dollars a year after a very bad financial crisis, where 8 million people lost their jobs and small businesses can't get loans, then I think that you shouldn't be feeling put upon." Then why is the Federal Government asking for more money? You made over a billion dollars last year. No wait I am sorry, you took over a billion dollars last year. I understand now, there is an obverse proportion to the amount to goods and services that you produce to the amount that you are supposed to "make". Since the Government doesn't "produce" anything, it should get the most money in return. Wow, Liberal Economics 101.

Now we are facing the "Dream" Act. How long did it take to come up with a "politically correct" name for amnesty? This bill would provide rights for certain undocumented immigrant students who graduate from U.S. high schools, who are of "good moral character". Does that start after the entered the County ILLEGALLY? How many violations of the law do they get before we can decide when to start counting? If the bar is Lindsey Lohan or Paris Hilton than it should be pretty easy for them.

How about coming up with something to protect the U.S. Citizens?

Your friend,

Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Stand in the place where you live

President Obama,

A lot of your critics says that you do not take a stand on issues. That you vote "Present" a lot or are too busy playing golf to actually know that something happened. Over 60 days in to the oil spill, you decide to meet with BP Executives. After over a year in office, you decided to meet with Generals about Iraq and Afghanistan. You have not always shown leadership when it has been needed.

However, today I am going to point out to your critics a different view. That you have chosen to take a stand on tough issues. That maybe you didn't answer the phone at 3 a.m., but you had someone read internet reports about the phone call and held a press conference to discuss it.

Now face North.

You have taken a stance on illegal immigration. You have identified one families' farm in Vermont that sits on the dangerous Canadian border that is crucial to the security of our country. A border entry point where three cars may cross a day. Your more than generous offer of under fifty thousand dollars for the 4.9 acre farm went unappreciated by the land owners, so you now see fit to use eminent domain to seize private property. Thank you for protecting our borders and keeping those Illegal Immigrant French Canadians out.

Now face West.

Sarah Palin has made several cutting remarks about your weaknesses on nuclear defense. However, you were quick to take a stand and point out that "Last I checked, Sarah Palin's not much of an expert on nuclear issues." How dare she make the suggestion that the United States be open to defending itself by any means necessary. Good for you standing up for yourself and telling the world that the United States is the only Nuclear Country that will not use it's weapons.

Now face South.

You have taken a tough stance on "rouge" states seeking to strengthen and enforce existing federal laws. It is understandable how no one in your administration has time to read a 16 page document when you have pressing issues like listening to all of those Blagojevich tapes. It is important to tell states that it is the job of the Federal Government to ignore it's own laws and they can go and make their own laws to enforce. Until then you are not going to allow States to use fundamentally flawed documents such at the Constitution to try to justify their actions.

Now face East.

You took swift and decisive action on dealing with General McChrystal, once the Rolling Stone article was published. A Commander-in-chief cannot have his military experts in the field disagreeing with his policies when he has been busy ignoring that there is still a situation and continues to not visit or meet with any military personnel. General Petraeus was an obvious replacement and seemed to be an automatic choice after being portrayed as "General Betray-Us" by the Democrats. But now, General McChrystal who had the support of the Afghan authorities is now going to be sent back to the United States where he will no longer be in a war zone, surrounded by insurgents who want to kill him and having to justify a flawed set of rules of engagement to the troops that he is trying to keep alive.

You have not had an easy job to undertake. But, when times get tough and your teleprompter cannot find the right words to comfort you, you can always come here for re-assurance. So stand in the place where you live, think about direction and wonder why you haven't before. If wishes were trees the trees would be falling. Listen to reason, season is calling. Your feet are going to be on the ground, your head is there to move you around. So stand.

Your friend,

Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

fool me once, shame on me

Dear Mr. President,

I suppose that your oath of office did not include the words "The Truth, The Whole Truth, and Nothing But The Truth so help me God." I suppose that as many times as you were sworn in, you are not really certain what you agreed to. Maybe we need to make a new rule that you only get three chances to be sworn in to office. After the third attempt, you have to step down. The most "Honest, ethical, and transparent" administration began behind closed doors in the middle of the night trying to get all of the oath right. I suppose before your first thirty days in office you didn't have your "Teleprompter Czar" yet. You have proved that opaque is the new transparent. Let's make an agreement to get through the next two years, you stop trying to screw up Our country and I promise not to vote for you next time.

Jason Sanborn

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Plug the hole!

Dear President Obama,

In this great time of need we are looking to Washington to lead, follow, or get out of the way. So far your administration has been willing to do anything but. When great action is needed, we are still on the starting blocks. When words of wisdom are being waited to be heard by citizens whose lives are being impacted you send out Robert Gibbs. When a clear concise location of the accident has been discussed, the Head of Homeland security identified the Ocean of Mexico.

To be fair, you have spoken with resolve on this matter. You have made it clear who is responsible when you said, “Let me be clear: BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill.." Quietly behind the scene Nancy Pelosi and the Three Stooges are discussing raising the Federal Tax on oil 32 cents a barrel or quadrupling the existing tax. If BP is responsible for the leak and will be paying the bill, why are they trying to raise $11 billion (11,000,000,000) over the next ten years? Is that how long you are planning to take to fix this situation?

BP is continuing to attempt one never before tested method to resolve this crisis after another. And again you have taken the action of using the force of language in the situation by saying: “And while there will be time to fully investigate what happened on that rig and hold responsible parties accountable, our focus now is on a fully coordinated, relentless response effort to stop the leak and prevent more damage to the Gulf.” So far, your relentless response has been: "Plug The Damn Hole". I suppose that is relentless, such harsh words to be spoken to someone or an organization who donated more to your campaign than to any candidate in any previous election. Maybe you can get the U.N. to draft a resolution that oil and water don’t mix.

President Bush was criticized after hurricane Katrina for not acting before the Governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco (D), requested action. Now you are refusing to act after the Governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal (R), has: submitted a plan, amassed resources, and is standing on the coast waiting for approval to begin the process. You are still waiting on the results of an “Environmental Impact Review” of building sand berms. Never having considered the impact if you don’t build the berms.

This can be but a mere foreshadowing for Dec 23, 2012. Should something actually happen like an asteroid comes hurling through the great cosmos towards our plant, we now know what the response will be. First you will seek a New World Order to come together and devise a plan to deal with the situation. Then you will commission a Galactic Impact Review of the effects of destroying or adjusting the course of the object that will spell certain doom for the entire human race and all living creatures should it reach Earth. While the plan is being studied by college professors, you will have to seek the assistance of foreign nations to travel to space to view the asteroid because you retired our space fleet. All the while that citizens of planet Earth are watching the countdown to impact with anticipation, Congress will be raising taxes to fund their own escape.

Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Even though I didn't read it, I still have an opinion

Dear Mr. Bill Press,

Today while I was scanning through channels on my new XM radio, I came across your program on XM's American Left Channel. You were discussing President Obama and Mexico's President Felipe Calderon’s comments on Arizona's law to enforce a pre-existing Federal Law. Your comments were how terrible this law was and that you were on the side of President Obama, President Calderon, and millions of illegal immigrants who are in this country now or seek to violate our laws by crossing our border improperly in the future. While I am certain that I am not your typical listener, being that there was no tinfoil on my head while I was listening to protect from my brain wave patterns from being read, I decided to call in to your show anyways.

Your phone screener who took my call and asked what my question was seemed to be very friendly until I told him what I was calling about. My question was "Which part of the Arizona law, specifically, were you in fear would violate the Civil Rights of American Citizens who were not in violation of any law or engaging in suspicious activity which would cause Law Enforcement Professionals to stop the individual?" and "Have you read the ten (10) page law?" Your call screener informed me that you did not have time to take my question.

I could see that had I not called in the first fifteen minutes of your show starting how you could possibly have enough callers in the queue that would run over the time limit of your show had I waited to have my questions answered, unless you do not have enough listeners to have more than a 30 minute show. I must have lost signal while in discussion with your call screener and had to call back due to no longer being connected when I was asking why you would not take my call. I was immediately able to get through to the same screener again, which tells me that I was the only caller, and asked him why you would not take my the question.

He put me on hold for a minute then came back and said that you did not want to take the question. This can only lead me to believe that much like Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, President Obama, and everyone else on the President's staff, you have not read the law of which you are not in favor. So, I am asking you now, are you not in favor or Arizona's right as a state to empower it's Law Enforcement Professionals to enforce Federal Laws or are you not in favor of the Federal Laws themselves? Would you actually prefer that people could come across our borders without any documentation, process, or paperwork? Do you support Illegal Immigration or do you think that people who break the law should have to face the punishment for the laws that were broken?

If your car were struck by an illegal immigrant and you were told by your insurance company that you were responsible for the damages because the person who were actually at fault was not a U.S. citizen therefore did not have; insurance or a driver's license and gave a phony address so they could not be tracked down, then I suppose that you would not mind that the individual would not be held accountable for their actions and would not be sent back to their county or origin.

Mexico has much harsher Illegal Immigration law's than we do. First the first offence the penalty is two years in prison. The second is about ten years. Do you favor Mexico’s Immigration laws? Are you in favor of the harsh penalty that is imposed? Do you support the rights of the Mexican Government to make an enforce laws within their own country? If you support the rights of the Mexican Government, then why do you not support the right of a State to make laws that strengthen U.S. laws?

I understand that this was not a fair discussion. I brought intelligent thought along with a well thought out argument. I am citing actual facts and actually HAVE read the bill. I had hoped that even though you were unarmed in a battle of wits that you would still find time to debate me on the air. Maybe others can call your show at 866-557-7377 and have more luck than I did about asking if you have read the ten page bill or not.

Perhaps, it was an unfair question. I understand that to keep your job of Left Wing radio Host you have to at least appear to be of the same intelligence as your listeners. Possibly it was phrasing of the question that made it difficult to answer. Instead of Illegal Immigrant, possibly I should have used the phrase "Undocumented Democratic Voter". Perhaps then you might have been able to answer. Perhaps one day me might stop being racist and unjust as a Nation and stop the illegal practice of making all of our laws in English which not all of our residents understand. Perhaps we can commission all of the Artists that Nancy Pelosi wants to be able to quit their jobs to pursue their passion to rewrite all of the laws of the United States in Picture Pages so that everyone can understand them.

Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas

Friday, April 30, 2010

Land of the Free

Dear President Obama,

The Democratic leaders have proposed requiring every worker in the nation to carry a national identification card with biometric information, such as a fingerprint, within the next six years, according to a draft of the measure. It would require all workers across the nation to carry a card with a digital encryption key that would have to match work authorization databases.

My question is, what is the criteria for being "Authorized to work?" Does being "Authorized to work" apply to elected officials also? Does this mean that Everyone in the United States would have to produce a Birth Certificate to stay employed?

Just wondering,

Jason Sanborn