Dear President Obama,
In this great time of need we are looking to Washington to lead, follow, or get out of the way. So far your administration has been willing to do anything but. When great action is needed, we are still on the starting blocks. When words of wisdom are being waited to be heard by citizens whose lives are being impacted you send out Robert Gibbs. When a clear concise location of the accident has been discussed, the Head of Homeland security identified the Ocean of Mexico.
To be fair, you have spoken with resolve on this matter. You have made it clear who is responsible when you said, “Let me be clear: BP is responsible for this leak. BP will be paying the bill.." Quietly behind the scene Nancy Pelosi and the Three Stooges are discussing raising the Federal Tax on oil 32 cents a barrel or quadrupling the existing tax. If BP is responsible for the leak and will be paying the bill, why are they trying to raise $11 billion (11,000,000,000) over the next ten years? Is that how long you are planning to take to fix this situation?
BP is continuing to attempt one never before tested method to resolve this crisis after another. And again you have taken the action of using the force of language in the situation by saying: “And while there will be time to fully investigate what happened on that rig and hold responsible parties accountable, our focus now is on a fully coordinated, relentless response effort to stop the leak and prevent more damage to the Gulf.” So far, your relentless response has been: "Plug The Damn Hole". I suppose that is relentless, such harsh words to be spoken to someone or an organization who donated more to your campaign than to any candidate in any previous election. Maybe you can get the U.N. to draft a resolution that oil and water don’t mix.
President Bush was criticized after hurricane Katrina for not acting before the Governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco (D), requested action. Now you are refusing to act after the Governor of Louisiana, Bobby Jindal (R), has: submitted a plan, amassed resources, and is standing on the coast waiting for approval to begin the process. You are still waiting on the results of an “Environmental Impact Review” of building sand berms. Never having considered the impact if you don’t build the berms.
This can be but a mere foreshadowing for Dec 23, 2012. Should something actually happen like an asteroid comes hurling through the great cosmos towards our plant, we now know what the response will be. First you will seek a New World Order to come together and devise a plan to deal with the situation. Then you will commission a Galactic Impact Review of the effects of destroying or adjusting the course of the object that will spell certain doom for the entire human race and all living creatures should it reach Earth. While the plan is being studied by college professors, you will have to seek the assistance of foreign nations to travel to space to view the asteroid because you retired our space fleet. All the while that citizens of planet Earth are watching the countdown to impact with anticipation, Congress will be raising taxes to fund their own escape.
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Even though I didn't read it, I still have an opinion
Dear Mr. Bill Press,
Today while I was scanning through channels on my new XM radio, I came across your program on XM's American Left Channel. You were discussing President Obama and Mexico's President Felipe Calderon’s comments on Arizona's law to enforce a pre-existing Federal Law. Your comments were how terrible this law was and that you were on the side of President Obama, President Calderon, and millions of illegal immigrants who are in this country now or seek to violate our laws by crossing our border improperly in the future. While I am certain that I am not your typical listener, being that there was no tinfoil on my head while I was listening to protect from my brain wave patterns from being read, I decided to call in to your show anyways.
Your phone screener who took my call and asked what my question was seemed to be very friendly until I told him what I was calling about. My question was "Which part of the Arizona law, specifically, were you in fear would violate the Civil Rights of American Citizens who were not in violation of any law or engaging in suspicious activity which would cause Law Enforcement Professionals to stop the individual?" and "Have you read the ten (10) page law?" Your call screener informed me that you did not have time to take my question.
I could see that had I not called in the first fifteen minutes of your show starting how you could possibly have enough callers in the queue that would run over the time limit of your show had I waited to have my questions answered, unless you do not have enough listeners to have more than a 30 minute show. I must have lost signal while in discussion with your call screener and had to call back due to no longer being connected when I was asking why you would not take my call. I was immediately able to get through to the same screener again, which tells me that I was the only caller, and asked him why you would not take my the question.
He put me on hold for a minute then came back and said that you did not want to take the question. This can only lead me to believe that much like Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, President Obama, and everyone else on the President's staff, you have not read the law of which you are not in favor. So, I am asking you now, are you not in favor or Arizona's right as a state to empower it's Law Enforcement Professionals to enforce Federal Laws or are you not in favor of the Federal Laws themselves? Would you actually prefer that people could come across our borders without any documentation, process, or paperwork? Do you support Illegal Immigration or do you think that people who break the law should have to face the punishment for the laws that were broken?
If your car were struck by an illegal immigrant and you were told by your insurance company that you were responsible for the damages because the person who were actually at fault was not a U.S. citizen therefore did not have; insurance or a driver's license and gave a phony address so they could not be tracked down, then I suppose that you would not mind that the individual would not be held accountable for their actions and would not be sent back to their county or origin.
Mexico has much harsher Illegal Immigration law's than we do. First the first offence the penalty is two years in prison. The second is about ten years. Do you favor Mexico’s Immigration laws? Are you in favor of the harsh penalty that is imposed? Do you support the rights of the Mexican Government to make an enforce laws within their own country? If you support the rights of the Mexican Government, then why do you not support the right of a State to make laws that strengthen U.S. laws?
I understand that this was not a fair discussion. I brought intelligent thought along with a well thought out argument. I am citing actual facts and actually HAVE read the bill. I had hoped that even though you were unarmed in a battle of wits that you would still find time to debate me on the air. Maybe others can call your show at 866-557-7377 and have more luck than I did about asking if you have read the ten page bill or not.
Perhaps, it was an unfair question. I understand that to keep your job of Left Wing radio Host you have to at least appear to be of the same intelligence as your listeners. Possibly it was phrasing of the question that made it difficult to answer. Instead of Illegal Immigrant, possibly I should have used the phrase "Undocumented Democratic Voter". Perhaps then you might have been able to answer. Perhaps one day me might stop being racist and unjust as a Nation and stop the illegal practice of making all of our laws in English which not all of our residents understand. Perhaps we can commission all of the Artists that Nancy Pelosi wants to be able to quit their jobs to pursue their passion to rewrite all of the laws of the United States in Picture Pages so that everyone can understand them.
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Today while I was scanning through channels on my new XM radio, I came across your program on XM's American Left Channel. You were discussing President Obama and Mexico's President Felipe Calderon’s comments on Arizona's law to enforce a pre-existing Federal Law. Your comments were how terrible this law was and that you were on the side of President Obama, President Calderon, and millions of illegal immigrants who are in this country now or seek to violate our laws by crossing our border improperly in the future. While I am certain that I am not your typical listener, being that there was no tinfoil on my head while I was listening to protect from my brain wave patterns from being read, I decided to call in to your show anyways.
Your phone screener who took my call and asked what my question was seemed to be very friendly until I told him what I was calling about. My question was "Which part of the Arizona law, specifically, were you in fear would violate the Civil Rights of American Citizens who were not in violation of any law or engaging in suspicious activity which would cause Law Enforcement Professionals to stop the individual?" and "Have you read the ten (10) page law?" Your call screener informed me that you did not have time to take my question.
I could see that had I not called in the first fifteen minutes of your show starting how you could possibly have enough callers in the queue that would run over the time limit of your show had I waited to have my questions answered, unless you do not have enough listeners to have more than a 30 minute show. I must have lost signal while in discussion with your call screener and had to call back due to no longer being connected when I was asking why you would not take my call. I was immediately able to get through to the same screener again, which tells me that I was the only caller, and asked him why you would not take my the question.
He put me on hold for a minute then came back and said that you did not want to take the question. This can only lead me to believe that much like Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, President Obama, and everyone else on the President's staff, you have not read the law of which you are not in favor. So, I am asking you now, are you not in favor or Arizona's right as a state to empower it's Law Enforcement Professionals to enforce Federal Laws or are you not in favor of the Federal Laws themselves? Would you actually prefer that people could come across our borders without any documentation, process, or paperwork? Do you support Illegal Immigration or do you think that people who break the law should have to face the punishment for the laws that were broken?
If your car were struck by an illegal immigrant and you were told by your insurance company that you were responsible for the damages because the person who were actually at fault was not a U.S. citizen therefore did not have; insurance or a driver's license and gave a phony address so they could not be tracked down, then I suppose that you would not mind that the individual would not be held accountable for their actions and would not be sent back to their county or origin.
Mexico has much harsher Illegal Immigration law's than we do. First the first offence the penalty is two years in prison. The second is about ten years. Do you favor Mexico’s Immigration laws? Are you in favor of the harsh penalty that is imposed? Do you support the rights of the Mexican Government to make an enforce laws within their own country? If you support the rights of the Mexican Government, then why do you not support the right of a State to make laws that strengthen U.S. laws?
I understand that this was not a fair discussion. I brought intelligent thought along with a well thought out argument. I am citing actual facts and actually HAVE read the bill. I had hoped that even though you were unarmed in a battle of wits that you would still find time to debate me on the air. Maybe others can call your show at 866-557-7377 and have more luck than I did about asking if you have read the ten page bill or not.
Perhaps, it was an unfair question. I understand that to keep your job of Left Wing radio Host you have to at least appear to be of the same intelligence as your listeners. Possibly it was phrasing of the question that made it difficult to answer. Instead of Illegal Immigrant, possibly I should have used the phrase "Undocumented Democratic Voter". Perhaps then you might have been able to answer. Perhaps one day me might stop being racist and unjust as a Nation and stop the illegal practice of making all of our laws in English which not all of our residents understand. Perhaps we can commission all of the Artists that Nancy Pelosi wants to be able to quit their jobs to pursue their passion to rewrite all of the laws of the United States in Picture Pages so that everyone can understand them.
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Friday, April 30, 2010
Land of the Free
Dear President Obama,
The Democratic leaders have proposed requiring every worker in the nation to carry a national identification card with biometric information, such as a fingerprint, within the next six years, according to a draft of the measure. It would require all workers across the nation to carry a card with a digital encryption key that would have to match work authorization databases.
My question is, what is the criteria for being "Authorized to work?" Does being "Authorized to work" apply to elected officials also? Does this mean that Everyone in the United States would have to produce a Birth Certificate to stay employed?
Just wondering,
Jason Sanborn
The Democratic leaders have proposed requiring every worker in the nation to carry a national identification card with biometric information, such as a fingerprint, within the next six years, according to a draft of the measure. It would require all workers across the nation to carry a card with a digital encryption key that would have to match work authorization databases.
My question is, what is the criteria for being "Authorized to work?" Does being "Authorized to work" apply to elected officials also? Does this mean that Everyone in the United States would have to produce a Birth Certificate to stay employed?
Just wondering,
Jason Sanborn
Monday, April 26, 2010
Nancy Fawkes Nite
Remember, Remember the 2nd of November
Healthcare Reform and Plot
I see no reason why any vote
Should ever be forgot
Healthcare Reform and Plot
I see no reason why any vote
Should ever be forgot
Monday, March 22, 2010
219-212
To the American People
Don't let President Obama and Nancy Pelosi fool you. The only bi-partisan part of Healthcare Reform was the vote against. No Republicans supported giving control of 1/3 of your unalienable rights over to the Government. Now that they control Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are next.
After the Bill was passed in your sleep, they announced there would be no "Death Panels". However, they can decide that you are tool old to get converge. They announced that now everyone will have coverage, because it will become illegal not to have coverage. They announced that you no longer have to worry about losing insurance coverage if you lose you job, because Private Insurance will go away.
They were so proud it passing this that they made sure that it was on CNN. However, it was passed in the dead of night, while you were sleeping. The Historic Legislation that no one wanted. Now it is up to the People to send a message back. November is when we will get to show our approval or disapproval.
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Don't let President Obama and Nancy Pelosi fool you. The only bi-partisan part of Healthcare Reform was the vote against. No Republicans supported giving control of 1/3 of your unalienable rights over to the Government. Now that they control Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness are next.
After the Bill was passed in your sleep, they announced there would be no "Death Panels". However, they can decide that you are tool old to get converge. They announced that now everyone will have coverage, because it will become illegal not to have coverage. They announced that you no longer have to worry about losing insurance coverage if you lose you job, because Private Insurance will go away.
They were so proud it passing this that they made sure that it was on CNN. However, it was passed in the dead of night, while you were sleeping. The Historic Legislation that no one wanted. Now it is up to the People to send a message back. November is when we will get to show our approval or disapproval.
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Putting the 'R' back
Dear DNC,
Thank you to all of your members. Though it has been a tough time that we have endured, you have given us hope. The Republican National Committee was once lost, but now is found. We are beginning to find new direction and learn from "Change".
It wasn't that America agreed with Liberal ideology, it was that you presented a more clear concise message. It followed the K.I.S.S. method of keeping it simple. It was something that you never had to explain. It was new and different and well spoken.
However, we have captured your momentum. We are no longer remaining unfocused. We are standing up for our values. We are bringing our followers and getting those that have strayed. We are moving back in to focus and putting the "R" back in "Change".
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Thank you to all of your members. Though it has been a tough time that we have endured, you have given us hope. The Republican National Committee was once lost, but now is found. We are beginning to find new direction and learn from "Change".
It wasn't that America agreed with Liberal ideology, it was that you presented a more clear concise message. It followed the K.I.S.S. method of keeping it simple. It was something that you never had to explain. It was new and different and well spoken.
However, we have captured your momentum. We are no longer remaining unfocused. We are standing up for our values. We are bringing our followers and getting those that have strayed. We are moving back in to focus and putting the "R" back in "Change".
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Hey Joe....
Dear Vice President Biden,
You have been a beacon of truth in this sometimes cloudy administration. You warned that We the American People would not always understand or agree with what this administration would attempt to accomplish. You also correctly assessed that “This will be tricky and we will make some mistakes.” A politician has spoken no truer words.
While these assessments more than likely were not viewed favorably by the President, the American People appreciated your candor and took heed. We assisted in diverting any mistakes by the administration by voting in Republican leadership in both New Jersey and Virginia. We also responded by electing Scott Brown as the forty-first Republican Senator in Massachusetts.
We have taken your warning about President Barack Omaba’s inexperience, however late. We now remain vigilant on Our watch from the American Government as well as those who seek to do us harm from over-seas. We are prepared to make hard decisions to protect ourselves and our families.
It is with these words in which I would like to express my gratitude for your greatest contribution to the American People. You have brought Our President back to his Faith. It has been noted previously that President Obama has missed the National Day of Prayer, has not picked a church in the Washington D.C. area, and has been more secular in his speech than previous administrations. However, every time you walk in to the Oval Office the President bows his head, closes his eyes, raises his hands and says a little prayer, “God what have I done?”
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
You have been a beacon of truth in this sometimes cloudy administration. You warned that We the American People would not always understand or agree with what this administration would attempt to accomplish. You also correctly assessed that “This will be tricky and we will make some mistakes.” A politician has spoken no truer words.
While these assessments more than likely were not viewed favorably by the President, the American People appreciated your candor and took heed. We assisted in diverting any mistakes by the administration by voting in Republican leadership in both New Jersey and Virginia. We also responded by electing Scott Brown as the forty-first Republican Senator in Massachusetts.
We have taken your warning about President Barack Omaba’s inexperience, however late. We now remain vigilant on Our watch from the American Government as well as those who seek to do us harm from over-seas. We are prepared to make hard decisions to protect ourselves and our families.
It is with these words in which I would like to express my gratitude for your greatest contribution to the American People. You have brought Our President back to his Faith. It has been noted previously that President Obama has missed the National Day of Prayer, has not picked a church in the Washington D.C. area, and has been more secular in his speech than previous administrations. However, every time you walk in to the Oval Office the President bows his head, closes his eyes, raises his hands and says a little prayer, “God what have I done?”
Jason Sanborn
From the soon to be former State of Texas
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
